A battle-tested Claude prompt that simulates 4 specialized expert roles at the same table — Frontier Tech VC, Deep Value Short Seller, Industry Insider, and Macro/Special Situations Trader — to produce an independent, anti-sycophantic investment thesis on any company you're researching. Four-step protocol: (1) structure the company state (tech maturity, revenue, runway, competition, key milestones), (2) generate separate theses per expert with 3 risks each, (3) run a dialogue where the experts critique each other on timeline reliability, cash burn vs. execution, and moat defensibility, (4) crystallize 3 bull arguments, 3 bear arguments, 2 critical unknowns, and a risk/reward story-quality assessment. Ends with the anti-sycophancy lock: "What is the weakest point of this analysis?" Proven on $AUR (Aurora Innovation). Works on any public or private company with enough data. Tone: technical, honest, no hype. Inspired by Karpathy-style adversarial prompt tactics.
Discovered on Twitter via @sgundoganX